philosophy

Provide a dictionary and translate the following argument into the language of propositional logic. Identify the premises and the conclusion.

Inductive inference is justified. Since, if it didn’t then there would be a significant manner in which the future does not resemble the past. We have a priori knowledge that it is not the case that there is a significant manner in which the future does not resemble the past. If it is knowledge that it is not the case that there is a significant manner in which the future does not resemble the past, then it is true that it is not the case that there is a significant manner in which the future does not resemble the past. But it is true that it is not the case that there is a significant manner in which the future does not resemble the past only if the conclusion is true.

philosophy just punched me in the stomach. does this even make sense?! not to mention this is only ONE question of my assignment. ohmygawwd. looks like tonight would be a long night.

philosophy just got major kick-ass confusing and irritating.

true story.